USGS, Alaska Glaciology Home Page USGS, Alaska Glaciology Home Page USGS Home Page USGS Alaska Glacier and Snow Program Banner.gif

 
 SEARCH
 
 
    
 BENCHMARK GLACIERS    
     Main Page
     3-Glacier Data
        Mass Balance
        Runoff
        Temperature
  Gulkana Glacier
     Main Page
     History
     Data
        Ice Thickness
        Mass Balance
        Meteorology
        Motion
        Runoff
        Surface Altitude
        Terminus Position
     Maps
     Photos
     Reports
  South Cascade Gl.
    
Main Page
     Data
        Mass Balance
     Photos
     Reports
  Wolverine Glacier
    
Main Page
     Data
        Mass Balance
       
Meteorology
        Runoff
     Maps
    
Reports

 OTHER GLACIERS
  Hubbard Glacier
    Main Page
    Maps
    Photos
    Reports

  Denali Fault Earthquake
    Main Page
    Photo Gallery
  Black Rapids Glacier
     Main Page
  Tlikakila River Glaciers
     Main Page

 

 LEARN ABOUT GLACIERS
  Univ. of Alaska
     Glacier Power
  USGS
     Questions & Myths
     Glaciers in the
                  News     
    
Ask a glaciologist
  World Data Center-A
     All About Glaciers
    

 RELATED SITES

 USGS
      Main home page
     Water, National
     Water, Alaska
    
Search
     Help

Top of this page

 


Image of 1st page of report (click for pdf; 243 KB)Comparison of geodetic and glaciological mass-balance techniques, Gulkana Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A.

by Leif H. Cox and Rod S. March

Journal of Glaciology, v. 50, no. 170, p. 363-370

ABSTRACT

The net mass balance on Gulkana Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A., has been measured since 1966 by the glaciological method, in which seasonal balances are measured at three index sites and extrapolated over large areas of the glacier. Systematic errors can accumulate linearly with time in this method. Therefore, the geodetic balance, in which errors are less time-dependent, was calculated for comparison with the glaciological method. Digital elevation models of the glacier in 1974, 1993 and 1999 were prepared using aerial photographs, and geodetic balances were computed, giving -6.0 ± 0.7 m w.e. from 1974 to 1993 and -11.8 ± 0.7 m w.e. from 1974 to 1999. These balances are compared with the glaciological balances over the same intervals, which were -5.8 ± 0.9 and -11.2 ± 1.0 m w.e. respectively; both balances show that the thinning rate tripled in the 1990s. These cumulative balances differ by <6%. For this close agreement, the glaciologically measured mass balance of Gulkana Glacier must be largely free of systematic errors and be based on a time-variable area–altitude distribution, and the photography used in the geodetic method must have enough contrast to enable accurate photogrammetry.


Cox, L.H. and March, R.S, 2004, Comparison of geodetic and glaciological mass-balance techniques, Gulkana Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A., Journal of Glaciology, v. 50, no. 170, p. 363-370


pdficon.gif (224 bytes)   [Full Report, Acrobat PDF (243 KB)]

Adobe Acrobat icon, links to Adobe web site to get free Acrobat Reader.Adobe Acrobat's .pdf (portable document file) format can be viewed using the free Adobe Acrobat Reader available for DOS, Windows, Macintosh, and UNIX. This link will allow you to get the free download and installation instructions from Adobe.

 

Maintainer: Rod March
Last update: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:47 AM
URL: http://ak.water.usgs.gov/glaciology/gulkana/reports/2004_geodetic_vs_glaciologic/